![]() ![]() In September 2020, police informants tipped the police that the team around Nabil B. with disputes with the OM and, at the same time, received protection from that same body. According to the OVV, this resulted in a conflict of interest that hindered the crime journalist’s security. De Vries only got surveillance from the Central Netherlands police, coordinated by the OM. de Vries’s murder, the police ignored crucial information that he was in danger.ĭe Vries did not get the same security as Nabil B.’s lawyers, which was arranged by the National Coordinator for Terrorism and Security. de Vries.Įven after two murders directly connected to Nabil B., a pattern of deafness to external warnings persisted, the OVV said. The appeal in their case is currently ongoing. were convicted and sentenced to 30 years in prison for the defense attorney’s murder. On 18 September 2019, Derk Wiersum was shot dead near his home. But the police officers responsible for analyzing threats around protected persons did not have access to SUmm-IT and, therefore, did not notice that Taghi’s gang was watching Wiersum’s house weeks before his murder. In the summer of 2019, the police’s Summ-IT system registered that a Renault Megane with false license plates, which was associated with Taghi’s gang, had been driving regular circles around Wiersum’s home in Amsterdam’s Buitenveldert neighborhood. But the authorities did nothing with these signals. B.’s family also informed the police that the lawyers were being watched. de Vries, who acted as B.’s confidential adviser. In the spring of 2019, Nabil B.’s lawyers raised concerns about their safety because of threats to Peter R. Nevertheless, that assumption led to police patrols around Wiersum’s house being reduced from once an hour to six times a day in the summer of 2018. ![]() Both Derk Wiersum and the security services felt that lawyers are replaceable and, therefore, not a logical target. was less extensive after the initial shock faded. But security for the lawyers representing Nabil B. Derk WiersumĪfter Reduan’s death, the authorities arranged strict security for his family. was convicted of this murder and sentenced to 28 years in prison. was shot dead at his business in Amsterdam Noord. According to the OVV, “actively looking for substantiation of a conceivable threat hardly took place.” Extra wry is that Amsterdam police officers asked whether Nabil B.’s relatives needed protection in the city, but the Central Netherlands police said it was unnecessary. After the OM announced B.’s status as the key witness to the media, his brother Reduan asked for personal security, fearing for his life.īut the Central Netherlands police concluded that Reduan was not eligible for extra security. ![]() One family member warned that, on the day the OM shared B.’s incriminating statements with lawyers from the Marengo trial, a member of Taghi’s gang had shown up at their home in Utrecht, demanding that B. But the authorities underestimated the danger to the rest of B.’s family. The Witness Protection Team arranged security for Nabil B., his ex-partner, and their child. as a key witness in the case against Ridouan Taghi and 17 alleged members of his gang. On 23 March 2018, the OM presented Nabil B. “Soft” information, such as warnings from Nabil B.’s family that members of Taghi’s gang were harassing them or watching and following lawyer Wiersum, did not lead to better security. That basically means only information that comes from police sources. Another damning conclusion was that tensions between crime journalist De Vries and the Public Prosecution Service (OM) stood in the way of his protection.Īccording to the OVV, the police’s information service (DRIO) only accepted “verifiable information” as a reason to increase the level of security for those involved in the Marengo process. And crucial information from other police departments did not make its way to the Surveillance & Security system in time to make a difference. The OVV report shows how, in particular, the security and information branch of the police - responsible for making threat analyses - ignored warnings about threats from the Taghi gang. The OVV investigated what went wrong with the Surveillance & Security system, which was supposed to organize the protection of the three murdered men. de Vries did not lead to better security in the run-up to their assassinations, RTL Nieuws reports based on a draft report from the Dutch Safety Board (OVV). Due to internal blunders, warnings about threats against B.’s brother Reduan, his lawyer Derk Wiersum, and his confidant Peter R. The police ignored multiple warnings about the three murders around Nabil B., the key witness in the Marengo assassinations case around Ridouan Taghi.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |